Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:67-70; doi:10.1136/jme.2005.014936
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

CLINICAL ETHICS

Doctor’s views on disclosing or withholding information on low risks of complication

G G Palmboom1, D L Willems1, N B A T Janssen2 and J C J M de Haes2

1 Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
D L Willems
Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, J2 119, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands;d.l.willems{at}amc.uva.nl

Background: More and more quantitative information is becoming available about the risks of complications arising from medical treatment. In everyday practice, this raises the question whether each and every risk, however low, should be disclosed to patients. What could be good reasons for doing or not doing so? This will increasingly become a dilemma for practitioners.

Objective: To report doctors’ views on whether to disclose or withhold information on low risks of complications.

Methods: In a qualitative study design, 37 respondents (gastroenterologists and gynaecologists or obstetricians) were included. Focus group interviews were held with 22 respondents and individual in-depth interviews with 15.

Results: Doctors have doubts about disclosing or withholding information on complication risk, especially in a risk range of 1 in 200 to 1 in 10 000. Their considerations on whether to disclose or to withhold information depend on a complicated mix of patient and doctor-associated reasons; on medical and personal considerations; and on the kind and purpose of intervention.

Discussion: Even though the degree of a risk is important in a doctor’s considerations, the severity of the possible complications and patients’ wishes and competencies have an important role as well. Respondents said that low risks should always be communicated when there are alternatives for the intervention or when the patient may prevent or mitigate the risk. When the appropriateness of disclosing risks is doubtful, doctors should always tell their patients that no intervention is without risk, give them the opportunity to gather all the information they need or want, and enable them to detect a complication at an early stage.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Janssen, N B A T, Oort, F J, Fockens, P, Willems, D L, de Haes, H C J M, Smets, E M A (2009). Under what conditions do patients want to be informed about their risk of a complication? A vignette study. J. Med. Ethics 35: 276-282 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.