Article Text
Abstract
Benatar argues that it is better never to have been born because of the harms always associated with human existence. Non-existence entails no harm, along with no experience of the absence of any benefits that existence might offer. Therefore, he maintains that procreation is morally irresponsible, along with the use of reproductive technology to have children. Women should seek termination if they become pregnant and it would be better for potential future generations if humans become extinct as soon as humanely possible. These views are challenged by the argument that while decisions not to procreate may be rational on the grounds of the harm that might occur, it may equally rational to gamble under certain circumstances that future children would be better-off experiencing the harms and benefits of life rather than never having the opportunity of experiencing anything. To the degree that Benatar’s arguments preclude the potential rationality of any such gamble, their moral relevance to concrete issues concerning human reproduction is weakened. However, he is right to emphasise the importance of foreseen harm when decisions are made to attempt to have children.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None
iBenatar also uses pain and pleasure to denote harm and benefit. For simplicity, I have stuck with the latter and hope that this does not distort his argument in some unforeseen manner.
Other content recommended for you
- Valuing health as development: going beyond gross domestic product
- Relationship of neonatologists’ end-of-life decisions to their personal fear of death
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?
- Experiences and practices of people categorised as being ‘at risk’ based on age during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study in the UK and Germany
- Honouring the donor: in death and in life
- The impact of physician migration on mortality in low and middle-income countries: an economic modelling study
- What are the attitudes of strictly-orthodox Jews to clinical trials: are they influenced by Jewish teachings?
- A matter of life and death
- The morality of risks in research: reflections on Kumar