Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:437-440; doi:10.1136/jme.2004.009605
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

CLINICAL ETHICS

Attitudes towards and barriers to writing advance directives amongst cancer patients, healthy controls, and medical staff

S Sahm1, R Will1 and G Hommel2

1 Department of Gastroenterology/Oncology, German Clinic of Diagnosis, Wiesbaden, Germany
2 Institute of Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr med. S Sahm
Department of Gastroenterology/Oncology, German Clinic of Diagnosis, Aukammallee 33, 65 191 Wiesbaden, Germany; stephan.sahm{at}t-online.de

Objectives: After years of public discussion too little is still known about willingness to accept the idea of writing an advance directive among various groups of people in EU countries. We investigated knowledge about and willingness to accept such a directive in cancer patients, healthy controls, physicians, and nursing staff in Germany.

Methods: Cancer patients, healthy controls, nursing staff, and physicians (n = 100 in each group) were surveyed by means of a structured questionnaire.

Results: Only 18% and 19% of the patients and healthy controls respectively, and 10% of the medical staff had written an advance directive. However, 50–81% of those surveyed indicated that they wished to write one. This intention was associated with deteriorating health (p < 0.001). Only 29% of the healthy controls and 43% of the patients knew about the possibility of appointing a health care proxy. A majority in all groups believed that advance directives may influence the course of treatment (79–85%), yet half of those surveyed in all groups fear that patients could be pressurised into writing an advance directive, and 38–65% thought that relatives could abuse such documents.

Conclusions: Only a minority of the participants had written an advance directive and knew about the possibility of authorising a health care proxy. Deteriorating health was associated with increasing willingness to make a directive. Despite a majority belief that advance directives may influence treatment at the end of life, other factors limit their employment, such as fear of abuse.

Keywords: advance directive; cancer patients; health care proxy; end of life; ethics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Go, R. S., Hammes, B. A., Lee, J. A., Mathiason, M. A. (2007). Advance Directives Among Health Care Professionals at a Community-Based Cancer Center. Mayo Clin Proc. 82: 1487-1490 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.