© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics
CLINICAL ETHICS
Extended antipaternalism
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S O Hansson
Philosophy Unit, Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 78, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden; soh{at}infra.kth.se
Extended antipaternalism means the use of antipaternalist arguments to defend activities that harm (consenting) others. As an example, a smokers right to smoke is often invoked in defence of the activities of tobacco companies. It can, however, be shown that antipaternalism in the proper sense does not imply such extended antipaternalism. We may therefore approve of Mills antipaternalist principle (namely, that the only reason to interfere with someones behaviour is to protect others from harm) without accepting activities that harm (consenting) others. This has immediate consequences for the ethics of public health. An antipaternalist need not refrain from interfering with activities such as the marketing of tobacco or heroin, boxing promotion, driving with unbelted passengers, or buying sex from "voluntary" prostitutes.
Keywords: paternalism; antipaternalism; extended antipaternalism; public health; ethics; responsibility
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
