JME

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:739-742; doi:10.1136/jme.2005.011908
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cowley, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cowley, C

TEACHING AND LEARNING ETHICS

The dangers of medical ethics

C Cowley

Correspondence to:
C Cowley
School of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK; c.cowley{at}uea.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
The dominant conception of medical ethics being taught in British and American medical schools is at best pointless and at worst dangerous, or so it will be argued. Although it is laudable that medical schools have now given medical ethics a secure place in the curriculum, they go wrong in treating it like a scientific body of knowledge. Ethics is a unique subject matter precisely because of its widespread familiarity in all areas of life, and any teaching has to start from this shared ethical understanding and from the familiar ethical concepts of ordinary language. Otherwise there is a real risk that spurious technocratic jargon will be deployed by teacher and student alike in the futile search for intellectual respectability, culminating in a misplaced sense of having "done" the ethics module. There are no better examples of such jargon than "consequentialism", "deontology", and the "Four Principles". At best, they cannot do the work they were designed to do and, at worst, they can lead student and practitioner into ignoring their own healthy ethical intuitions and vocabulary.


Keywords: Gillon; ethical experience; four principles; ordinary language; teaching ethics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JRSMHome page
D. K Sokol
William Osler and the jubjub of ethics; or how to teach medical ethics in the 21st century
J R Soc Med, December 1, 2007; 100(12): 544 - 546.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
F. Claudot, F. Alla, X. Ducrocq, and H. Coudane
Teaching ethics in Europe
J. Med. Ethics, August 1, 2007; 33(8): 491 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
C. Johnston and P. Haughton
Medical students' perceptions of their ethics teaching
J. Med. Ethics, July 1, 2007; 33(7): 418 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
I Brassington
Teaching to the converted: religious belief in the seminar room.
J. Med. Ethics, November 1, 2006; 32(11): 678 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
A G Sutton
Reasoned and reasonable approaches to ethics in undergraduate medical courses.
J. Med. Ethics, November 1, 2006; 32(11): 682 - 682.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Re: The dangers of medical ethics
David J Brookman
JME Online, 5 Dec 2005 [Full text]
Reasoned and reasonable approaches to ethics in undergraduate medical courses
Adrian G. Sutton
JME Online, 9 Jan 2006 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.