JME

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:693-697; doi:10.1136/jme.2004.011452
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M
Right arrow Articles by Dugan, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M
Right arrow Articles by Dugan, E

CLINICAL ETHICS

The impact on patient trust of legalising physician aid in dying

M Hall1, F Trachtenberg2, E Dugan3

1 Wake Forest University Schools of Medicine and Law, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
2 The New England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA, USA
3 University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA

Correspondence to:
Mark A Hall
Wake Forest University, School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1063, USA; mhall{at}wfubmc.edu Objective: Little empirical evidence exists to support either side of the ongoing debate over whether legalising physician aid in dying would undermine patient trust.

Design: A random national sample of 1117 US adults were asked about their level of agreement with a statement that they would trust their doctor less if "euthanasia were legal [and] doctors were allowed to help patients die".

Results: There was disagreement by 58% of the participants, and agreement by only 20% that legalising euthanasia would cause them to trust their personal physician less. The remainder were neutral. These attitudes were the same in men and women, but older people and black people had more agreement that euthanasia would lower trust. However, overall, only 27% of elderly people (age 65+) and 32% of black people thought that physician aid in dying would lower trust. These views differed with physical and mental health, and also with education and income, with those having more of these attributes tending to view physician aid in dying somewhat more favourably. Again, however, overall views in most of these subgroups were positive. Views about the effect of physician aid in dying on trust were significantly correlated with participants’ underlying trust in their physicians and their satisfaction with care. In a multivariate regression model, trust, satisfaction, age, and white/black race remained independently significant.

Conclusion: Despite the widespread concern that legalising physician aid in dying would seriously threaten or undermine trust in physicians, the weight of the evidence in the USA is to the contrary, although views vary significantly.


Abbreviations: PAS, physician-assisted suicide

Keywords: doctor–patient relationship; euthanasia; physician-assisted suicide; trust




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
D Harris, B Richard, and P Khanna
Assisted dying: the ongoing debate.
Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2006; 82(970): 479 - 482.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
H. Marcovitch
What's new this month in BMJ Journals.
BMJ, February 25, 2006; 332(7539): 476 - 476.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.