MEDICAL ETHICS
Can arguments address concerns?
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Matti HäyryCentre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; matti.hayry{at}manchester.ac.uk
People have concerns, and ethicists often respond to them with philosophical arguments. But can conceptual constructions properly address fears and anxieties? It is argued in this paper that while it is possible to voice, clarify, create andto a certain extenttackle concerns by arguments, more concrete practices, choices, and actions are normally needed to produce proper responses to peoples worries. While logical inconsistencies and empirical errors can legitimately be exposed by arguments, the situation is considerably less clear when it comes to moral, cultural, and emotional norms, values, and expectations.
Keywords: arguments; concerns; bioethics; ethics; philosophy
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Deckers, J.
(2007). Are those who subscribe to the view that early embryos are persons irrational and inconsistent? A reply to Brock. J. Med. Ethics
33: 102-106
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
