© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics
REPRODUCTION
There is a difference between selecting a deaf embryo and deafening a hearing child
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
M Häyry
Centre for Professional Ethics, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK; mhayry{at}uclan.ac.uk
If genetic diagnosis and preimplantation selection could be employed to produce deaf children, would it be acceptable for deaf parents to do so? Some say no, because there is no moral difference between selecting a deaf embryo and deafening a hearing child, and because it would be wrong to deafen infants. It is argued in this paper, however, that this view is untenable. There are differences between the two activities, and it is perfectly possible to condone genetic selection for deafness while condemning attempts to deafen infants at birth.
Keywords: deafness; genetics; morality; selection
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Slowther, A.
(2008). Selection of embryos. Clin Ethics
3: 60-62
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
