Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2004;30:410-413; doi:10.1136/jme.2003.002386
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2004;30:410-413
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics

CLINICAL ETHICS

Stem cells, embryos, and the environment: a context for both science and ethics

C R Towns and D G Jones

Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor D Gareth Jones
Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand; gareth.jones{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz

Debate on the potential and uses of human stem cells tends to be conducted by two constituencies—ethicists and scientists. On many occasions there is little communication between the two, with the result that ethical debate is not informed as well as it might be by scientific insights. The aim of this paper is to highlight those scientific insights that may be of relevance for ethical debate.

Environmental factors play a significant role in identifying stem cells and their various subtypes. Research related to the role of the microenvironment has led to emphasis upon "plasticity", which denotes the ability of one type of stem cell to undergo a transition to cells from other lineages. This could increase the value given to adult stem cells, in comparison with embryonic stem cell research. Any such conclusion should be treated with caution, however, since optimism of this order is not borne out by current research.

The role of the environment is also important in distinguishing between the terms totipotency and pluripotency. We argue that blastocysts (early embryos) and embryonic stem cells are only totipotent if they can develop within an appropriate environment. In the absence of this, they are merely pluripotent. Hence, blastocysts in the laboratory are potentially totipotent, in contrast to their counterparts within the human body which are actually totipotent. This may have implications for ethical debate, suggesting as it does that arguments based on potential for life may be of limited relevance.

Keywords: adult stem cells; embryonic stem cells; environment; pluripotency


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Siepe, M., Akhyari, P., Lichtenberg, A., Schlensak, C., Beyersdorf, F. (2008). Stem cells used for cardiovascular tissue engineering.. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 34: 242-247 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jones, D.G., Towns, C.R. (2006). Navigating the quagmire: the regulation of human embryonic stem cell research. Hum Reprod 21: 1113-1116 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.