© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics
CLINICAL ETHICS
Ethics of refusing parental requests to withhold or withdraw treatment from their premature baby
1 Department of Paediatrics, Hillingdon Hospital, London, UK
2 Department of Medicine, St Thomas Hospital, London, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr R Boyle
Paediatric Registrar, Department of Paediatrics, Pield Heath Road, Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3NN, UK; BobBoyle{at}doctors.org.uk
In the United Kingdom women have access to termination of pregnancy for maternal reasons until 24 weeks completed gestation, but it is accepted practice for children born at or beyond 25 weeks gestation to be treated according to the childs perceived best interests even if this is not in accordance with parental wishes. The authors present a case drawn from clinical practice which highlights the discomfort that parents may feel about such an abrupt change in their rights over their child, and argue that parents should have greater autonomy over treatment decisions regarding their prematurely born children.
Keywords: abortion; consent; child; treatment withdrawal
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Janvier, A., Leblanc, I., Barrington, K. J.
(2008). The Best-Interest Standard Is Not Applied for Neonatal Resuscitation Decisions. Pediatrics
121: 963-969
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
