HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boyle, R J Articles by Arnander, M W Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boyle, R J Articles by Arnander, M W

Ethics of refusing parental requests to withhold or withdraw treatment from their premature baby

¹ Department of Paediatrics, Hillingdon Hospital, London, UK
² Department of Medicine, St Thomas Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr R Boyle
Paediatric Registrar, Department of Paediatrics, Pield Heath Road, Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3NN, UK; BobBoyle{at}doctors.org.uk In the United Kingdom women have access to termination of pregnancy for maternal reasons until 24 weeks’ completed gestation, but it is accepted practice for children born at or beyond 25 weeks’ gestation to be treated according to the child’s perceived best interests even if this is not in accordance with parental wishes. The authors present a case drawn from clinical practice which highlights the discomfort that parents may feel about such an abrupt change in their rights over their child, and argue that parents should have greater autonomy over treatment decisions regarding their prematurely born children.

Keywords: abortion; consent; child; treatment withdrawal

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Janvier, I. Leblanc, and K. J. Barrington The Best-Interest Standard Is Not Applied for Neonatal Resuscitation Decisions Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): 963 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]