JME

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Web-only Appendices
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sivakumar, R
Right arrow Articles by Khan, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sivakumar, R
Right arrow Articles by Khan, S
J Med Ethics 2004;30:311-312
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics


BRIEF REPORT

Communicating information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation to hospitalised patients

R Sivakumar1, J Knight2, C Devlin2, P Keir3, P Ghosh1, S Khan1

1 Department of Elderly Care, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
2 East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, UK
3 Department of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Welwyn Garden City, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr R Sivakumar
Strathmore Wing, Lister Hospital, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage, UK; sivasiva51{at}hotmail.com
ABSTRACT
Aim: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate two different methods of communicating information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to patients admitted to general medical and elderly care wards. The information was either in the form of a detailed information leaflet (appendix I) or a summary document (appendix II). The study examined the willingness of patients in seeking detailed information on cardiopulmonary issues.

Setting: The study was conducted over three months on a general medical ward and an acute elderly care ward in two district general hospitals.

Methods: A detailed information leaflet on CPR was provided to the nursing staff on the wards. An A4 summary document summarising the CPR decision making process and basic information on cardiopulmonary issues was placed in a folder at the foot of each bed on the elderly care ward. On the general medical ward it was displayed prominently over the head of all beds.

Results: Out of the 274 patients admitted to the general medical ward only two requests were received for the detailed information leaflet. On the elderly care ward there were 182 admissions but no patients or their relatives requested the leaflet.

Conclusions: Availability of basic information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation to all patients is practical and does not lead to unnecessary distress or offence to patients or their carers. It makes the decision making process more transparent. Detailed information leaflets are of value for a minority of hospitalised patients.


Keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; information leaflet

Abbreviations: CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
H. Johnson and A Nelson
The acceptability of an information leaflet explaining cardiopulmonary resuscitation policy in the hospice setting: a qualitative study exploring patients' views
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2008; 22(5): 647 - 652.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.