Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2004;30:311-312; doi:10.1136/jme.2002.002915
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2004;30:311-312
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics

BRIEF REPORT

Communicating information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation to hospitalised patients

R Sivakumar1, J Knight2, C Devlin2, P Keir3, P Ghosh1 and S Khan1

1 Department of Elderly Care, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
2 East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, UK
3 Department of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Welwyn Garden City, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr R Sivakumar
Strathmore Wing, Lister Hospital, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage, UK; sivasiva51{at}hotmail.com

ABSTRACT

Aim: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate two different methods of communicating information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to patients admitted to general medical and elderly care wards. The information was either in the form of a detailed information leaflet (appendix I) or a summary document (appendix II). The study examined the willingness of patients in seeking detailed information on cardiopulmonary issues.

Setting: The study was conducted over three months on a general medical ward and an acute elderly care ward in two district general hospitals.

Methods: A detailed information leaflet on CPR was provided to the nursing staff on the wards. An A4 summary document summarising the CPR decision making process and basic information on cardiopulmonary issues was placed in a folder at the foot of each bed on the elderly care ward. On the general medical ward it was displayed prominently over the head of all beds.

Results: Out of the 274 patients admitted to the general medical ward only two requests were received for the detailed information leaflet. On the elderly care ward there were 182 admissions but no patients or their relatives requested the leaflet.

Conclusions: Availability of basic information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation to all patients is practical and does not lead to unnecessary distress or offence to patients or their carers. It makes the decision making process more transparent. Detailed information leaflets are of value for a minority of hospitalised patients.

Keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; information leaflet

Abbreviations: CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Johnson, H., Nelson, A (2008). The acceptability of an information leaflet explaining cardiopulmonary resuscitation policy in the hospice setting: a qualitative study exploring patients' views. Palliat Med 22: 647-652 [Abstract]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.