JME

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffer, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffer, N
J Med Ethics 2004;30:227-230
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics


CLINICAL ETHICS

"If you think you’ve got a lump, they’ll screen you." Informed consent, health promotion, and breast cancer

N Pfeffer

Correspondence to:
N Pfeffer
Department of Applied Social Studies, London Metropolitan University, Ladbroke House, 62–66 Highbury Grove, London N5 2AD; n.pfeffer{at}londonmet.ac.uk A great deal has been written about information that is or should be provided when seeking consent to medical research and treatment. Relatively little attention has been paid to information describing health promotion interventions. This paper critically examines some information material describing three different methods of encouraging early presentation of breast cancer in the UK: the NHS breast screening programme, breast self examination, and breast awareness. Findings from a content analysis of printed material and a series of focus group discussions that included women who speak little or no English were organised around the Department of Health’s recommendations about the information which should be provided when seeking consent to treatment and research. They exposed inconsistencies, ambiguities, and gaps, which when taken together suggest both compliance and non-compliance are being achieved in the absence of informed consent. The findings also provide a starting point for a discussion about how informed consent to health promotion might be sought.


Keywords: breast cancer; early diagnosis; health promotion; information; informed consent

Abbreviations: BA, breast awareness; BSE, breast self examination; NHSBSP, National Health Service Breast Screening Programme




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
W Osterlie, M Solbjor, J-A Skolbekken, S Hofvind, A R Saetnan, and S Forsmo
Challenges of informed choice in organised screening
J. Med. Ethics, September 1, 2008; 34(9): e5 - e5.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.