Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2004;30:190-193; doi:10.1136/jme.2003.006031
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2004;30:190-193
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics

RESEARCH ETHICS

The standard of care debate: the Declaration of Helsinki versus the international consensus opinion

R K Lie1,2, E Emanuel2, C Grady2, D Wendler2

1 Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
2 Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor R Lie
Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Kalfarveien 31, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Reidar.Lie{at}fil.uib.no

The World Medical Association’s revised Declaration of Helsinki endorses the view that all trial participants in every country are entitled to the worldwide best standard of care. In this paper the authors show that this requirement has been rejected by every national and international committee that has examined this issue. They argue that the consensus view now holds that it is ethically permissible, in some circumstances, to provide research participants less than the worldwide best care. Finally, the authors show that there is also consensus regarding the broad conditions under which this is acceptable.

Keywords: international research ethics; research ethics

Abbreviations: CIOMS, Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences; NBAC, National Bioethics Advisory Commission; UNAIDS, United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; WMA, World Medical Association


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Calain, P., Fiore, N., Poncin, M., Hurst, S. A. (2009). Research Ethics and International Epidemic Response: The Case of Ebola and Marburg Hemorrhagic Fevers. Public Health Ethics 2: 7-29 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Barkhof, F., Calabresi, P. A., Clanet, M., Cohen, J. A., Cutter, G. R., Freedman, M. S., Kappos, L., Lublin, F. D., McFarland, H. F., Metz, L. M., Miller, A. E., Montalban, X., O'Connor, P. W., Panitch, H., Richert, J. R., Petkau, J., Schwid, S. R., Sormani, M. P., Thompson, A. J., Weinshenker, B. G., Wolinsky, J. S. (2008). Ethics of placebo-controlled clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: A reassessment. Neurology 70: 1134-1140 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Daugherty, C. K., Ratain, M. J., Emanuel, E. J., Farrell, A. T., Schilsky, R. L. (2008). Ethical, Scientific, and Regulatory Perspectives Regarding the Use of Placebos in Cancer Clinical Trials. JCO 26: 1371-1378 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Goodyear, M. D E, Krleza-Jeric, K., Lemmens, T. (2007). The Declaration of Helsinki. BMJ 335: 624-625 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.