© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics
SYMPOSIUM ON EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE
Ethical issues of cost effectiveness analysis and guideline setting in mental health care
1 Institute for Bioethics, Health Ethics and Philosophy, Department of Caring Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
2 Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
R Berghmans
Institute for Bioethics, Health Ethics and Philosophy, Department of Caring Sciences, University of Maastricht, PO Box 616, 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands; r.berghmans{at}ige.unimaas.nl
This article discusses ethical issues which are raised as a result of the introduction of economic evidence in mental health care in order to rationalise clinical practice. Cost effectiveness studies and guidelines based on such studies are often seen as impartial, neutral instruments which try to reduce the influence of non-scientific factors. However, such rationalising instruments often hide normative assumptions about the goals of treatment, the selection of treatments, the role of the patient, and the just distribution of scarce resources. These issues are dealt with in the context of increased control over clinical practice by third parties. In particular, health insurers have a great interest in economic evidence in clinical care settings in order to control access to and quality of (mental) health care. The authors conclude that guideline setting and cost effectiveness analysis may be seen as important instruments for making choices in health care, including mental health care, but that such an approach should always go hand in hand with a social and political debate about the goals of medicine and (mental) health care. This article is partly based on the results of a research project on the normative aspects of guideline setting in psychiatry and cardiology which was conducted under the guidance of the Royal Dutch Medical Association.
Keywords: cost effectiveness analysis; guidelines; mental health care; ethics
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
