Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2003;29:325-329; doi:10.1136/jme.29.6.325
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2003;29:325-329
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics

HIV AND ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES

Should HIV discordant couples have access to assisted reproductive technologies?

M Spriggs1 and T Charles2

1 Ethics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Childrens Hospital/University of Melbourne. Centre for Human Bioethics, Monash University
2 Mitochondrial Laboratory, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Childrens Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
M Spriggs
Ethics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Childrens Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia; spriggsm{at}murdoch.rch.unimelb.edu.au

In this paper we identify and evaluate arguments for and against offering assisted reproductive technologies (ART), specifically IVF, to HIV discordant couples (male partner HIV positive, female partner HIV negative). The idea of offering ART to HIV discordant couples generates concerns about safety and public health and raises questions such as: what is an acceptable level of risk to offspring and should couples who want this assistance be subject to selection criteria; should they undergo scrutiny about their suitability as parents when those who are able to conceive naturally face no such scrutiny and people with other illnesses are given access to ART? We conclude that offering ART to HIV discordant couples is likely to produce more benefit than harm and violates no ethical principles. Nevertheless, a decision to deny treatment need not constitute unjustified discrimination.

Keywords: assisted reproductive technologies; HIV discordant couples; IVF; public health


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Barreiro, P., Castilla, J. A., Labarga, P., Soriano, V. (2007). Is natural conception a valid option for HIV-serodiscordant couples?. Hum Reprod 22: 2353-2358 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zutlevics, T. (2006). Should ART be offered to HIV-serodiscordant and HIV-seroconcordant couples: an ethical discussion?. Hum Reprod 21: 1956-1960 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fineschi, V, Neri, M, Turillazzi, E (2005). The new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (Law 40/2004). J. Med. Ethics 31: 536-539 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • (2004). ...and others agree to help for HIV discordant couples. Sex. Transm. Infect. 80: 137-137 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.