Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2003;29:307-312; doi:10.1136/jme.29.5.307
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2003;29:307-312
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics

FESTSCHRIFT

Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be "first among equals"

R Gillon

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor R Gillon, Centre for Primary Care and Social Medicine Ethics Unit, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Reynolds Building, St Dunstan’s Road, London W6 8RP, UK;
raanan.gillon{at}imperial.ac.uk

It is hypothesised and argued that "the four principles of medical ethics" can explain and justify, alone or in combination, all the substantive and universalisable claims of medical ethics and probably of ethics more generally. A request is renewed for falsification of this hypothesis showing reason to reject any one of the principles or to require any additional principle(s) that can’t be explained by one or some combination of the four principles. This approach is argued to be compatible with a wide variety of moral theories that are often themselves mutually incompatible. It affords a way forward in the context of intercultural ethics, that treads the delicate path between moral relativism and moral imperialism. Reasons are given for regarding the principle of respect for autonomy as "first among equals", not least because it is a necessary component of aspects of the other three. A plea is made for bioethicists to celebrate the approach as a basis for global moral ecumenism rather than mistakenly perceiving and denigrating it as an attempt at global moral imperialism.

Keywords: four principles approach to medical ethics; principlism; intercultural ethics; Thomas Beauchamp; James Childress; Jehovah’s Witnesses


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Whitty-Rogers, J., Alex, M., MacDonald, C., Pierrynowski Gallant, D., Austin, W. (2009). Working with Children in End-of-Life Decision Making. Nurs Ethics 16: 743-758 [Abstract]  
  • Wadensten, B., Ahlstrom, G. (2009). Ethical Values in Personal Assistance: Narratives of People with Disabilities. Nurs Ethics 16: 759-774 [Abstract]  
  • Walker, T. (2009). What principlism misses. J. Med. Ethics 35: 229-231 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sokol, D. K (2009). Sweetening the scent: commentary on "What principlism misses". J. Med. Ethics 35: 232-233 [Full Text]  
  • Molyneux, D (2009). Should healthcare professionals respect autonomy just because it promotes welfare?. J. Med. Ethics 35: 245-250 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sarkar, S. P. (2009). Life after therapy: post-termination boundary violations in psychiatry and psychotherapy. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 15: 82-87 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Baines, P. (2008). Death and best interests. Clin Ethics 3: 171-175 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lindblad, A., Lofmark, R., Lynoe, N. (2008). Physician-assisted suicide: a survey of attitudes among Swedish physicians. Scand J Public Health 36: 720-727 [Abstract]  
  • Baines, P (2008). Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics. J. Med. Ethics 34: 141-145 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Charuvastra, A, Marder, S R (2008). Unconscious emotional reasoning and the therapeutic misconception. J. Med. Ethics 34: 193-197 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hewitt, J. (2007). Ethical Components of Researcher Researched Relationships in Qualitative Interviewing. Qual Health Res 17: 1149-1159 [Abstract]  
  • Wheatley, V. J, Baker, J I. (2007). "Please, I want to go home": ethical issues raised when considering choice of place of care in palliative care. Postgrad. Med. J. 83: 643-648 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sarkar, S. P. (2006). The welfare state: justice or theft?: INVITED COMMENTARY ON... TALKING LIBERTIES. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 12: 211-213 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dawson, A, Garrard, E (2006). In defence of moral imperialism: four equal and universal prima facie principles.. J. Med. Ethics 32: 200-204 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Vince, T, Petros, A (2006). Should children's autonomy be respected by telling them of their imminent death?. J. Med. Ethics 32: 21-23 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cowley, C (2005). The dangers of medical ethics. J. Med. Ethics 31: 739-742 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yentis, S M (2005). The use of patients for learning and maintaining practical skills. JRSM 98: 299-302 [Full Text]  
  • Tsai, D F-C (2005). The bioethical principles and Confucius' moral philosophy. J. Med. Ethics 31: 159-163 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • SARKAR, S. P., ADSHEAD, G. (2005). Black robes and white coats: who will win the new mental health tribunals?. Br. J. Psychiatry 186: 96-98 [Full Text]  
  • Sheikh, A., Cook, A., Ashcroft, R. (2004). Making cycle helmets compulsory: ethical arguments for legislation. JRSM 97: 262-265 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.