JME

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gillon, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gillon, R
J Med Ethics 2003;29:307-312
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics


FESTSCHRIFT

Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be "first among equals"

R Gillon

Correspondence to:
Professor R Gillon, Centre for Primary Care and Social Medicine Ethics Unit, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Reynolds Building, St Dunstan’s Road, London W6 8RP, UK;
raanan.gillon{at}imperial.ac.uk It is hypothesised and argued that "the four principles of medical ethics" can explain and justify, alone or in combination, all the substantive and universalisable claims of medical ethics and probably of ethics more generally. A request is renewed for falsification of this hypothesis showing reason to reject any one of the principles or to require any additional principle(s) that can’t be explained by one or some combination of the four principles. This approach is argued to be compatible with a wide variety of moral theories that are often themselves mutually incompatible. It affords a way forward in the context of intercultural ethics, that treads the delicate path between moral relativism and moral imperialism. Reasons are given for regarding the principle of respect for autonomy as "first among equals", not least because it is a necessary component of aspects of the other three. A plea is made for bioethicists to celebrate the approach as a basis for global moral ecumenism rather than mistakenly perceiving and denigrating it as an attempt at global moral imperialism.


Keywords: four principles approach to medical ethics; principlism; intercultural ethics; Thomas Beauchamp; James Childress; Jehovah’s Witnesses




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
P Baines
Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics
J. Med. Ethics, March 1, 2008; 34(3): 141 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
A Charuvastra and S R Marder
Unconscious emotional reasoning and the therapeutic misconception
J. Med. Ethics, March 1, 2008; 34(3): 193 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
J. Hewitt
Ethical Components of Researcher Researched Relationships in Qualitative Interviewing
Qual Health Res, October 1, 2007; 17(8): 1149 - 1159.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
V. J Wheatley and J I. Baker
"Please, I want to go home": ethical issues raised when considering choice of place of care in palliative care
Postgrad. Med. J., October 1, 2007; 83(984): 643 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
S. P. Sarkar
The welfare state: justice or theft?: INVITED COMMENTARY ON... TALKING LIBERTIES
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., May 1, 2006; 12(3): 211 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
A Dawson and E Garrard
In defence of moral imperialism: four equal and universal prima facie principles.
J. Med. Ethics, April 1, 2006; 32(4): 200 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
T Vince and A Petros
Should children's autonomy be respected by telling them of their imminent death?
J. Med. Ethics, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 21 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
C Cowley
The dangers of medical ethics
J. Med. Ethics, December 1, 2005; 31(12): 739 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
S M Yentis
The use of patients for learning and maintaining practical skills
J R Soc Med, July 1, 2005; 98(7): 299 - 302.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
D F-C Tsai
The bioethical principles and Confucius' moral philosophy
J. Med. Ethics, March 1, 2005; 31(3): 159 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. P. SARKAR and G. ADSHEAD
Black robes and white coats: who will win the new mental health tribunals?
The British Journal of Psychiatry, February 1, 2005; 186(2): 96 - 98.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
A. Sheikh, A. Cook, and R. Ashcroft
Making cycle helmets compulsory: ethical arguments for legislation
J R Soc Med, June 1, 2004; 97(6): 262 - 265.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.