FESTSCHRIFT

In praise of unprincipled ethics

J Harris

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
John Harris, Institute of Medicine, Law and Bioethics, School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK;
john.m.harris{at}man.ac.uk

In this paper a plea is made for an unprincipled approach to biomedical ethics, unprincipled of course just in the sense that the four principles are neither the start nor the end of the process of ethical reflection. While the four principles constitute a useful "checklist" approach to bioethics for those new to the field, and possibly for ethics committees without substantial ethical expertise approaching new problems, it is an approach which if followed by the bioethics community as a whole would, the author believes, lead to sterility and uniformity of approach of a quite mindbogglingly boring kind. Moreover, much of bioethics is not concerned with identifying the principles or values appropriate to a particular issue, but rather involves analysing the arguments that are so often already in play and which present themselves as offering solutions in one direction or another. Here, as I try to show in discussion of these four scenarios, the principles allow massive scope in interpretation and are, frankly, not wonderful as a means of detecting errors and inconsistencies in argument.

Keywords: four principles approach to medical ethics; Raanan Gillon; Thomas Beauchamp; James Childress; organ donation; germline enhancement

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Jensen, E. (2008). Through thick and thin: rationalizing the public bioethical debate over therapeutic cloning. Clin Ethics 3: 194-198 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wasserman, J A, Dure, L S IV (2008). The social psychology of amateur ethicists: blood product recall notification and the value of reflexivity. J. Med. Ethics 34: 530-533 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Baines, P (2008). Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics. J. Med. Ethics 34: 141-145 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sokol, D. K (2007). William Osler and the jubjub of ethics; or how to teach medical ethics in the 21st century. JRSM 100: 544-546 [Full Text]  
• Cowley, C (2005). The dangers of medical ethics. J. Med. Ethics 31: 739-742 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Savulescu, J (2003). Festschrift edition of the Journal of Medical Ethics in honour of Raanan Gillon. J. Med. Ethics 29: 265-266 [Full Text]  
• Gillon, R (2003). Ethics needs principles--four can encompass the rest--and respect for autonomy should be "first among equals". J. Med. Ethics 29: 307-312 [Abstract] [Full Text]