|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
FESTSCHRIFT |
Correspondence to:
Professor T L Beauchamp, Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, 37th and O Sts, NW, Washington DC 20007, USA;
beauchat{at}georgetown.edu
The four principles approach to medical ethics plus specification is used in this paper. Specification is defined as a process of reducing the indeterminateness of general norms to give them increased action guiding capacity, while retaining the moral commitments in the original norm. Since questions of method are central to the symposium, the paper begins with four observations about method in moral reasoning and case analysis. Three of the four scenarios are dealt with. It is concluded in the "standard" Jehovahs Witness case that having autonomously chosen the authority of his religious institution, a Jehovahs Witness has a reasonable basis on which to refuse a recommended blood transfusion. The authors view of the child of a Jehovahs Witness scenario is that it is morally requirednot merely permittedto overrule this parental refusal of treatment. It is argued in the selling kidneys for transplantation scenario that a fair system of regulating and monitoring would be better than the present system which the author believes to be a shameful failure.
Keywords: the four principles approach to medical ethics; Jehovahs Witnesses; organ donation;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Jakusovaite and V. Bankauskaite Teaching ethics in a Masters Program in Public Health in Lithuania J. Med. Ethics, July 1, 2007; 33(7): 423 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Berrisford Psychiatr. Bull., May 1, 2007; 31(5): 193 - 193. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Claassen Financial incentives for antipsychotic depot medication: ethical issues J. Med. Ethics, April 1, 2007; 33(4): 189 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Claassen, W. K. Fakhoury, R. Ford, and S. Priebe Money for medication: financial incentives to improve medication adherence in assertive outreach Psychiatr. Bull., January 1, 2007; 31(1): 4 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B O Olusanya, L M Luxon, and S L Wirz Ethical issues in screening for hearing impairment in newborns in developing countries. J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2006; 32(10): 588 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Thornton Judgement and the role of the metaphysics of values in medical ethics. J. Med. Ethics, June 1, 2006; 32(6): 365 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Samama Preemptive use of recombinant activated factor VII: many questions but few answers/L'usage preventif du facteur VII recombinant active : beaucoup de questions, peu de reponses. Can J Anesth, April 1, 2006; 53(4): 336 - 338. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N J Kerruish and S P Robertson Newborn screening: new developments, new dilemmas J. Med. Ethics, July 1, 2005; 31(7): 393 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S Muula and J. M Mfutso-Bengo Important but Neglected Ethical and Cultural Considerations in the Fight Against HIV/AIDS in Malawi Nursing Ethics, September 1, 2004; 11(5): 479 - 488. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Savulescu Festschrift edition of the Journal of Medical Ethics in honour of Raanan Gillon J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2003; 29(5): 265 - 266. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Gillon Ethics needs principles--four can encompass the rest--and respect for autonomy should be "first among equals" J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2003; 29(5): 307 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |