ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Knowledge of the legislation governing proxy consent to treatment and research

G Bravo¹, M Pquet² and M-F Dubois¹

¹ Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Canada, and Research Centre on Aging, Sherbrooke University Geriatric Institute, Sherbrooke, Canada
² Research Centre on Aging, Sherbrooke University Geriatric Institute, Sherbrooke, Canada

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr G Bravo, Research Centre on Aging, Sherbrooke University Geriatric Institute, 1036 Belvedere South, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada J1H 4C4;
gina.bravo{at}usherbrooke.ca

Objective: To assess the knowledge of four groups of individuals regarding who is legally authorised to consent to health care or research involving older patients.

Design: A provincewide postal survey.

Setting: Province of Quebec, Canada.

Participants: Three hundred older adults, 434 informal caregivers of cognitively impaired individuals, 98 researchers in aging and 136 members of research ethics boards (REBs).

Measurements: Knowledge was assessed through a pretested postal questionnaire comprising five vignettes that describe hypothetical situations involving an older adult who requires medical care or is solicited for research. The respondent had to identify the person who is legally authorised to provide consent.

Results: Nearly 80% of all respondents provided the correct answer when the hypothetical scenario depicted a person who was competent to consent or incompetent but legally represented. Knowledge was worse (from 2% among older adults to 44% among REB members) for the scenario describing a research situation that involved an incompetent adult without a legal guardian.

Conclusion: The observed lack of knowledge raises doubts about the ability of current legislation to truly protect the rights of older adults with diminished decision making capacity. It points to the need for educational programmes aimed at increasing public awareness of the legislation put in place for those requiring special protection.

Keywords: substituted consent; legislation; knowledge; older adult; informal caregiver; researcher

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Resnick, B., Gruber-Baldini, A. L., Pretzer-Aboff, I., Galik, E., Buie, V. C., Russ, K., Zimmerman, S. (2007). Reliability and Validity of the Evaluation to Sign Consent Measure. Gerontologist 47: 69-77 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fowell, A, Johnstone, R, Finlay, I G, Russell, D, Russell, I T (2006). Design of trials with dying patients: a feasibility study of cluster randomisation versus randomised consent. Palliat Med 20: 799-804 [Abstract]  
• Schildmann, J, Cushing, A, Doyal, L, Vollmann, J (2004). Symposium on consent and confidentiality. J Med Ethics 2003;29:2-40. J. Med. Ethics 30: 609-609 [Full Text]