SYMPOSIUM ON CONSENT AND CONFIDENTIALITY

Some limits of informed consent

O O'Neill

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr O O'Neill, Newnham College, Cambridge University, Cambridge, CB3 9DF, UK

Many accounts of informed consent in medical ethics claim that it is valuable because it supports individual autonomy. Unfortunately there are many distinct conceptions of individual autonomy, and their ethical importance varies. A better reason for taking informed consent seriously is that it provides assurance that patients and others are neither deceived nor coerced. Present debates about the relative importance of generic and specific consent (particularly in the use of human tissues for research and in secondary studies) do not address this issue squarely. Consent is a propositional attitude, so intransitive: complete, wholly specific consent is an illusion. Since the point of consent procedures is to limit deception and coercion, they should be designed to give patients and others control over the amount of information they receive and opportunity to rescind consent already given.

Keywords: informed consent; implied consent; generic consent; specific consent; autonomy

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Arning, M., Forgo, N., Krugel, T. (2009). Data protection in grid-based multicentric clinical trials: killjoy or confidence-building measure?. Phil Trans R Soc A 367: 2729-2739 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Carusi, A., Jirotka, M. (2009). From data archive to ethical labyrinth. Qualitative Research 9: 285-298 [Abstract]  
• Swartling, U, Helgesson, G, Hansson, M G, Ludvigsson, J (2009). Split views among parents regarding children's right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey. J. Med. Ethics 35: 450-455 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Felt, U., Bister, M. D., Strassnig, M., Wagner, U. (2009). Refusing the information paradigm: informed consent, medical research, and patient participation. Health (London) 13: 87-106 [Abstract]  
• Rounsaville, D. B., Hunkele, K., Easton, C. J., Nich, C., Carroll, K. M. (2008). Making Consent More Informed: Preliminary Results From a Multiple-Choice Test Among Probation-Referred Marijuana Users Entering a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 36: 354-359 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ponder, M, Statham, H, Hallowell, N, Moon, J A, Richards, M, Raymond, F L (2008). Genetic research on rare familial disorders: consent and the blurred boundaries between clinical service and research. J. Med. Ethics 34: 690-694 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Swartling, U, Helgesson, G (2008). Self-assessed understanding as a tool for evaluating consent: reflections on a longitudinal study. J. Med. Ethics 34: 557-562 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Elwyn, G. (2008). Patient consent--decision or assumption?. BMJ 336: 1259-1260 [Full Text]  
• Hofmann, B, Lysdahl, K B (2008). Moral principles and medical practice: the role of patient autonomy in the extensive use of radiological services. J. Med. Ethics 34: 446-449 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Barnett, A T, Crandon, I, Lindo, J F, Gordon-Strachan, G, Robinson, D, Ranglin, D (2008). An assessment of the process of informed consent at the University Hospital of the West Indies. J. Med. Ethics 34: 344-347 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Coleman, M. P (2007). Commentary: Is epidemiology really dead, anyway? * A look back at Kenneth Rothman's 'The rise and fall of epidemiology, 1950 2000 AD'. Int J Epidemiol 36: 719-723 [Full Text]  
• Hem, M. H., Heggen, K., Ruyter, K. W (2007). Questionable Requirement for Consent in Observational Research in Psychiatry. Nurs Ethics 14: 41-53 [Abstract]  
• Jaspers, P., van der Arend, A., Wanders, R. (2006). Inclusion Practice in Lung Cancer Trials. Nurs Ethics 13: 649-660 [Abstract]  
• El-Wakeel, H, Taylor, G J, Tate, J J T (2006). What do patients really want to know in an informed consent procedure? A questionnaire-based survey of patients in the Bath area, UK.. J. Med. Ethics 32: 612-616 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bullington, J (2006). Body and self: a phenomenological study on the ageing body and identity. Med. Humanities 32: 25-31 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Barrett, G., Cassell, J. A, Peacock, J. L, Coleman, M. P (2006). National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry. BMJ 332: 1068-1072 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jepson, R G, Hewison, J, Thompson, A G H, Weller, D (2005). How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening. J. Med. Ethics 31: 192-196 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Aveyard, H. (2005). Informed Consent Prior to Nursing Care Procedures. Nurs Ethics 12: 19-29 [Abstract]  
• Wood-Harper, J. (2005). Informing Education Policy on MMR: balancing individual freedoms and collective responsibilities for the promotion of public health. Nurs Ethics 12: 43-58 [Abstract]  
• Schildmann, J, Cushing, A, Doyal, L, Vollmann, J (2004). Symposium on consent and confidentiality. J Med Ethics 2003;29:2-40. J. Med. Ethics 30: 609-609 [Full Text]  
• de Lacey, S., Norman, R.J. (2004). What should we do with donated embryos that may be genetically affected?. Hum Reprod 19: 1065-1068 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Messer, N G (2004). Professional-patient relationships and informed consent. Postgrad. Med. J. 80: 277-283 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Robling, M R, Hood, K, Houston, H, Pill, R, Fay, J, Evans, H M (2004). Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study. J. Med. Ethics 30: 104-109 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Informed Consent, not consensus

Celio Levyman, MD, MSc

JME Online, 30 Jun 2004 [Full text]