© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
SYMPOSIUM ON CONSENT AND CONFIDENTIALITY
Misled and confused? Telling the public about MMR vaccine safety
1 Department of Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
2 US Agency for International Development, Washington, USA
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr C J Clements, Department of Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland;
clementscj{at}who.ch
The extraordinary events surrounding the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in the United Kingdom have not only placed in jeopardy the use of this triple vaccine but have also spread concern to other parts of the world. Examination of the publics worry about MMR vaccine reveals they have been exposed to a range of conflicting views resulting in the feeling of having been misled about the safety of the vaccine. There are various groups and individuals who have legitimate roles in informing the public about such subjects. But is each one behaving in an ethically responsible way? And if confidence falters, vaccine coverage dips, and an outbreak of measles, mumps, or rubella ensues, who, if anyone, will stand and say "I misled them, I confused them, this is my responsibility"? We examine the ethical issues of each group with a voice in the debate about vaccine safety.
Keywords: MMR vaccine; vaccine safety; public health; immunisation; WHO
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Clarke, C. E.
(2008). A Question of Balance: The Autism-Vaccine Controversy in the British and American Elite Press. Science Communication
30: 77-107
[Abstract] -
Mishra, G., Kok, H., Ecob, R., Cooper, R., Hardy, R., Kuh, D.
(2006). Cessation of Hormone Replacement Therapy After Reports of Adverse Findings From Randomized Controlled Trials: Evidence From a British Birth Cohort. Am. J. Public Health
96: 1219-1225
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
McGreevy, D.
(2005). Risks and benefits of the single versus the triple MMR vaccine: how can health professionals reassure parents?. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health
125: 84-86
[Abstract] -
Wood-Harper, J.
(2005). Informing Education Policy on MMR: balancing individual freedoms and collective responsibilities for the promotion of public health. Nurs Ethics
12: 43-58
[Abstract] -
Messer, N G
(2004). Professional-patient relationships and informed consent. Postgrad. Med. J.
80: 277-283
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
