Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2002;28:318-321; doi:10.1136/jme.28.5.318
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2002;28:318-321
© 2002 Journal of Medical Ethics

RESEARCH ETHICS

New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest

E Cave1 and S Holm2

1 Department of Law, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
2 Institute for Medicine, Law and Bioethics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
E Cave, Lecturer in Law, Department of Law, 20 Lyddon Terrace, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK;
laweggc{at}leeds.ac.uk

This paper examines the UK’s response to a recent European Clinical Trials Directive, namely the Department of Health, Central Office for Research Ethics Committee guidance, Governance Arrangements for NHS Research Ethics Committees. The revisions have been long awaited by researchers and research ethics committee members alike. They substantially reform the ethical review system in the UK. We examine the new arrangements and argue that though they go a long way toward addressing the uncertainty surrounding ethics committee function, the system favours the facilitation of research over the protection of the dignity and welfare of research participants.

Keywords: Research ethics; research ethics committees


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hunter, D. (2007). Efficiency and the proposed reforms to the NHS research ethics system. J. Med. Ethics 33: 651-654 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Seiler, C M, Kellmeyer, P, Kienle, P, Buchler, M W, Knaebel, H-P, the INSECT Study Group, (2007). Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial. J. Med. Ethics 33: 113-118 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Al-Shahi, R. (2005). Research ethics committees in the UK--the pressure is now on research and development departments. JRSM 98: 444-447 [Full Text]  
  • Dal-Re, R, Ortega, R, Morejon, E (2005). Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?. J. Med. Ethics 31: 344-350 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.