Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2001;27:331-337; doi:10.1136/jme.27.5.331
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2001; 27:331-337
© 2001 the Journal of Medical Ethics

A protocol for consultation of another physician in cases of euthanasia and assisted suicide

Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen and Gerrit van der Wal

Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

Objective—Consultation of another physician is an important method of review of the practice of euthanasia. For the project "support and consultation in euthanasia in Amsterdam" which is aimed at professionalising consultation, a protocol for consultation was developed to support the general practitioners who were going to work as consultants and to ensure uniformity.

Participants—Ten experts (including general practitioners who were experienced in euthanasia and consultation, a psychiatrist, a social geriatrician, a professor in health law and a public prosecutor) and the general practitioners who were going to use the protocol.

Evidence—There is limited literature on consultation: discursive articles and empirical studies describing the practice of euthanasia.

Consensus—An initial draft on the basis of the literature was commented on by the experts and general practitioners in two rounds. Finally, the protocol was amended after it had been used during the training of consultants.

Conclusions—The protocol differentiates between steps that are necessary in a consultation and steps that are recommended. Guidelines about four important aspects of consultation were given: independence, expertise, tasks and judgment of the consultant. In 97% of 109 consultations in which the protocol was used the consultant considered the protocol to be useful to a greater or lesser extent. Although this protocol was developed locally, it also employs universal principles. Therefore it can be of use in the development of consultation elsewhere.

Key Words: Euthanasia • assisted suicide • consultation • quality assurance • protocol


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • NAUDTS, K., DUCATELLE, C., KOVACS, J., LAURENS, K., VAN DEN EYNDE, F., VAN HEERINGEN, C. (2006). Euthanasia: the role of the psychiatrist. Br. J. Psychiatry 188: 405-409 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gastmans, C, Van Neste, F, Schotsmans, P (2004). Facing requests for euthanasia: a clinical practice guideline. J. Med. Ethics 30: 212-217 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Batlle, J. C. (2003). Legal Status of Physician-Assisted Suicide. JAMA 289: 2279-2281 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.