Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2001;27:114-117; doi:10.1136/jme.27.2.114
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2001; 27:114-117
© 2001 the Journal of Medical Ethics

The value of taking an ‘ethics history’

Gwen M Sayers, David Barratt, Catherine Gothard, Clive Onnie, Sunimalee Perera and Daniel Schulman

Northwick Park Hospital, London

Abstract

Objectives—To study the value of taking an ethics history as a means of assessing patients' preferences for decision making and for their relatives' involvement.

Design—Questionnaire administered by six junior doctors to 56 mentally competent patients, admitted into general and geriatric medical beds.

Setting—A large district general hospital in the United Kingdom.

Main measures—To establish whether patients were adequately informed about their illness and whether they minded the information being communicated to their relatives. To establish their preference regarding truthful disclosure and participation in decision making with risk attached. To establish whether they wished to be involved in CPR decision making, and if not, who should make the decision. To establish whether they knew of living wills and whether they had any advance directives.

Results—Twenty-four (43%) were inadequately informed of their illness.Forty-six (82%) said they would want to know were something serious to be found. Twenty-eight (50%) wanted to make their own decision if requiring risky treatment and 11 (20%) wanted family members involved. Thirty-one (55%) wanted to make a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decision and five of these decisions differed from those made by the doctors. Twenty-five (45%) preferred the doctors to decide. Eleven (20%) of the patients had heard of living wills but only one had executed such a will. Seven (13%) of the patients wished to provide advance directives. Three (5%) did not find the history taking helpful but none were discomforted.

Conclusion—Taking an ethics history is a simple means of obtaining useful information about patients' preferences.

Key Words: Autonomy • confidentiality • CPR decision-making • advance directives


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Das, A. K., Das, L., Mulley, G. P. (2006). Awareness of living wills in the United Kingdom. Age Ageing 35: 543-543 [Full Text]  
  • Murtagh, F E M, Thorns, A (2006). Evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making.. J. Med. Ethics 32: 311-315 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Murtagh, F-E M, Thorns, A. (2005). Taking an 'ethics history'. JRSM 98: 442-443 [Full Text]  
  • Sayers, G. M, Das, A K, Mulley, G P (2005). Taking an 'ethics history' * Authors' reply. JRSM 98: 435-436 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.