© 2001 the Journal of Medical Ethics
The value of taking an ethics history
Northwick Park Hospital, London
ObjectivesTo study the value of taking an ethics history as a means of assessing patients' preferences for decision making and for their relatives' involvement.
DesignQuestionnaire administered by six junior doctors to 56 mentally competent patients, admitted into general and geriatric medical beds.
SettingA large district general hospital in the United Kingdom.
Main measuresTo establish whether patients were adequately informed about their illness and whether they minded the information being communicated to their relatives. To establish their preference regarding truthful disclosure and participation in decision making with risk attached. To establish whether they wished to be involved in CPR decision making, and if not, who should make the decision. To establish whether they knew of living wills and whether they had any advance directives.
ResultsTwenty-four (43%) were inadequately informed of their illness.Forty-six (82%) said they would want to know were something serious to be found. Twenty-eight (50%) wanted to make their own decision if requiring risky treatment and 11 (20%) wanted family members involved. Thirty-one (55%) wanted to make a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decision and five of these decisions differed from those made by the doctors. Twenty-five (45%) preferred the doctors to decide. Eleven (20%) of the patients had heard of living wills but only one had executed such a will. Seven (13%) of the patients wished to provide advance directives. Three (5%) did not find the history taking helpful but none were discomforted.
ConclusionTaking an ethics history is a simple means of obtaining useful information about patients' preferences.
Key Words: Autonomy confidentiality CPR decision-making advance directives
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Das, A. K., Das, L., Mulley, G. P.
(2006). Awareness of living wills in the United Kingdom. Age Ageing
35: 543-543
[Full Text] -
Murtagh, F E M, Thorns, A
(2006). Evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making.. J. Med. Ethics
32: 311-315
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Murtagh, F-E M, Thorns, A.
(2005). Taking an 'ethics history'. JRSM
98: 442-443
[Full Text] -
Sayers, G. M, Das, A K, Mulley, G P
(2005). Taking an 'ethics history' * Authors' reply. JRSM
98: 435-436
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
