Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2001;27:110-113; doi:10.1136/jme.27.2.110
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2001; 27:110-113
© 2001 the Journal of Medical Ethics

Is it in a neonate's best interest to enter a randomised controlled trial?

Peter Allmark, Su Mason, A Bryan Gill and Christopher Megone

University of Sheffield, University of Leeds, General Infirmary at Leeds and University of Leeds, respectively

Abstract

Clinicians are required to act in the best interest of neonates. However, it is not obvious that entry into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is in a neonate's best interest because such trials often involve additional onerous procedures (such as intramuscular injections) in return for which the neonate receives unproven treatment or a placebo. On the other hand, neonatology needs to develop its evidence base, and RCTs are central to this task. The solution posited here is based on two points. First, "best interest" is not equivalent to "the best possible interest" only to "best interest within a certain realm". The realm of deliberation when asking the title question is the neonate's health. Deliberating in this realm may involve the exclusion from consideration of some factors that might be thought relevant (such as parental wealth). Furthermore, circumstances may dictate the need to deliberate on other factors that might be thought irrelevant (such as health care resources). Second, deciding on a neonate's best interest does not involve "putting oneself in its shoes". Rather, it involves asking in what it has an interest, or stake. These will include some things in which we all, as human beings, have a stake, such as medical progress. Putting these two points together, in the realm of health the answer to whether RCT entry is in a neonate's best interest is usually very finely balanced. Where this is the case, it is reasonable to invoke a broader notion of best interest and include a broader range of elements in which the neonate has a stake, including medical progress. In this way RCT entry can, usually, be said to be in a neonate's best interest.

Key Words: Neonates • randomised controlled trials • best interest • ethics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Burgess, E, Singhal, N, Amin, H, McMillan, D D, Devrome, H, Fenton, A C (2003). Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study * COMMENTARY. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 88: F280-F286 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.