Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2001;27:12-15; doi:10.1136/jme.27.1.12
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2001; 27:12-15
© 2001 the Journal of Medical Ethics

Artificial nutrition and hydration in the patient with advanced dementia: is withholding treatment compatible with traditional Judaism?

Muriel R Gillick

Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Abstract

Several religious traditions are widely believed to advocate the use of life-sustaining treatment in all circumstances. Hence, many believe that these faiths would require the use of a feeding tube in patients with advanced dementia who have lost interest in or the capacity to swallow food. This article explores whether one such tradition—halachic Judaism—in fact demands the use of artificial nutrition and hydration in this setting. Traditional (halachic) arguments have been advanced holding that treatment can be withheld in persons who are dying, in individuals whose condition causes great suffering, or in the event that the treatment would produce suffering. Individuals with advanced dementia can be considered to be dying, often suffer as a result of their dementia, and are likely to suffer from the use of a feeding tube. Given these observations and the absence of a compelling case for distinguishing between tube feeding and other forms of medical treatment, traditional Judaism appears compatible with withholding artificial nutrition for individuals with advanced dementia.

Key Words: Nutrition • hydration • Judaism • religion • dementia


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • MacRae, S, Chidwick, P, Berry, S, Secker, B, Hebert, P, Shaul, R Z., Faith, K, Singer, P A (2005). Clinical bioethics integration, sustainability, and accountability: the Hub and Spokes Strategy. J. Med. Ethics 31: 256-261 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.