Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for ethical guidelines

Wolfram Henn

Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany

The ethical guidelines for prenatal diagnosis proposed by the World Health Organisation (WHO), as well as by national regulations, only refer to paternity and gender of the fetus as unacceptable, disease-unrelated criteria for prenatal selection, as no other such parameters are at hand so far. This perspective is too narrow because research on complex genetic systems such as cognition and ageing is about to provide clinically applicable tests for genetic constituents of potentially desirable properties such as intelligence or longevity which could be misused as parameters for prenatal diagnosis. Moreover, there is an increasing number of prenatally testable genetic traits, such as heritable deafness, which are generally regarded as pathological but desired by some prospective parents and taken into account as parameters for pro-disability selection. To protect prenatal diagnosis from ethically unacceptable genetic consumerism, guidelines must be clarified as soon as possible and updated towards a worldwide restriction of prenatal genetic testing to immediately disease-determining traits.

Key Words: Genetics • prenatal diagnosis • ethics • consumerism

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Slowther, A. (2008). Selection of embryos. Clin Ethics 3: 60-62 [Full Text]  
• Turney, L. (2005). The Incidental Discovery of Nonpaternity Through Genetic Carrier Screening: An Exploration of Lay Attitudes. Qual Health Res 15: 620-634 [Abstract]  
• Greenhalgh, T., Wessely, S. (2004). 'Health for me': a sociocultural analysis of healthism in the middle classes. Br Med Bull 69: 197-213 [Full Text]  
• Kerr, A. (2003). Rights and Responsibilities in the New Genetics Era. Critical Social Policy 23: 208-226 [Abstract]