Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2000;26:396-399; doi:10.1136/jme.26.5.396
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2000; 26:396-399
© 2000 the Journal of Medical Ethics

Futility has no utility in resuscitation medicine

Michael Ardagh

Christchurch School of Medicine, Christchurch, New Zealand

Abstract

"Futility" is a word which means the absence of benefit. It has been used to describe an absence of utility in resuscitation endeavours but it fails to do this. Futility does not consider the harms of resuscitation and we should consider the balance of benefit and harm that results from our resuscitation endeavours. If a resuscitation is futile then any harm that ensues will bring about an unfavourable benefit/harm balance. However, even if the endeavour is not futile, by any definition, the benefit/harm balance may still be unfavourable if the harms that ensue are great.

It is unlikely that we will ever achieve a consensus definition of futility and certainly not one that is applicable to every patient undergoing resuscitation. In the meantime our use of the term "futile", in the mistaken belief that it tells us whether it is worth resuscitating or not, has no utility as it will never succeed in telling us this. Furthermore we risk causing offence by use of the term and we risk harming the patient's autonomy by using futility as an overriding force. Instead we should consider the utility of our endeavours, for which an assessment of the harms of resuscitation should be added to our considerations of its benefit. This balance of benefit and harm should then be evaluated as best it can be from the patient's perspective. The words futile and futility should be abandoned by resuscitationists.

Key Words: Futility • resuscitation • benefit/harm balance • autonomy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Morrison, L. J., Visentin, L. M., Kiss, A., Theriault, R., Eby, D., Vermeulen, M., Sherbino, J., Verbeek, P. R., the TOR Investigators, (2006). Validation of a rule for termination of resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.. NEJM 355: 478-487 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nielson, C, Wingete, D (2004). Intensive care and invasive ventilation in the elderly patient, implications of chronic lung disease and comorbidities. Chronic Respiratory Disease 1: 43-54 [Abstract]  
  • Bailey, S. (2004). The Concept of Futility in Health Care Decision Making. Nurs Ethics 11: 77-83 [Abstract]  
  • Simonds, A K (2003). Ethics and decision making in end stage lung disease. Thorax 58: 272-277 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.