Principles of justice in health care rationing

Richard Cookson and Paul Dolan

University of East Anglia and University of Sheffield, respectively

This paper compares and contrasts three different substantive (as opposed to procedural) principles of justice for making health care priority-setting or "rationing" decisions: need principles, maximising principles and egalitarian principles. The principles are compared by tracing out their implications for a hypothetical rationing decision involving four identified patients. This decision has been the subject of an empirical study of public opinion based on small-group discussions, which found that the public seem to support a pluralistic combination of all three kinds of rationing principle. In conclusion, it is suggested that there is room for further work by philosophers and others on the development of a coherent and pluralistic theory of health care rationing which accords with public opinions.

Key Words: Health care • rationing • medical ethics • justice • need

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Norheim, O. F. (2008). Clinical priority setting. BMJ 337: a1846-a1846 [Full Text]  
• Cookson, R, McCabe, C, Tsuchiya, A (2008). Public healthcare resource allocation and the Rule of Rescue. J. Med. Ethics 34: 540-544 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jayasinghe, S. (2007). Faith-based NGOs and healthcare in poor countries: a preliminary exploration of ethical issues. J. Med. Ethics 33: 623-626 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kraus, C. K., Levy, F., Kelen, G. D. (2007). Lifeboat Ethics: Considerations in the Discharge of Inpatients for the Creation of Hospital Surge Capacity. dmphp 1: 51-56 [Full Text]  
• Gericke, C A, Riesberg, A, Busse, R (2005). Ethical issues in funding orphan drug research and development. J. Med. Ethics 31: 164-168 [Abstract] [Full Text]