Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2000;26:183-187; doi:10.1136/jme.26.3.183
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2000; 26:183-187
© 2000 the Journal of Medical Ethics

Examining consent within the patient-doctor relationship

Marwan A Habiba

University of Leicester, Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Leicester

Abstract

The notion of consent which rose to the forefront in biomedical ethics as an attempt to safeguard patients' autonomy, is relatively new. The notion itself requires qualification, for it precludes neither duress nor ignorance. More seriously, I argue here that consent is redundant except in situations where paternalism prevails. Paradoxically, these are the very situations where it may be difficult to uphold or to verify voluntary consent. I suggest that a request-based relationship has the potential to overcome these difficulties. It enhances patients' participation in decision making, requires that the patients remain in command and avoids their subordination. Request is also more conducive to treatments that are representative of patients' own values and perceptions. In practice, what one wants and what one agrees to, often concur. But these are not conceptually identical issues, and they carry important differences of emphasis.

Key Words: Consent • request • paternalism


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Delany, C (2008). Making a difference: incorporating theories of autonomy into models of informed consent. J. Med. Ethics 34: e3-e3 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Vince, T, Petros, A (2006). Should children's autonomy be respected by telling them of their imminent death?. J. Med. Ethics 32: 21-23 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Habiba, M, Jackson, C, Akkad, A, Kenyon, S, Dixon-Woods, M (2004). Women's accounts of consenting to surgery: is consent a quality problem?. Qual Saf Health Care 13: 422-427 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kottow, M (2004). The battering of informed consent. J. Med. Ethics 30: 565-569 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • White, S M (2004). Consent for anaesthesia. J. Med. Ethics 30: 286-290 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

patient/doctor care
bob ratcliffe
JME Online, 10 Mar 2009 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.