Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2000;26:121-125; doi:10.1136/jme.26.2.121
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2000; 26:121-125
© 2000 the Journal of Medical Ethics

Death - whose decision? Euthanasia and the terminally ill

Sharon I Fraser and James W Walters

Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA

Abstract

In Australia and Oregon, USA, legislation to permit statutory sanctioned physician-assisted dying was enacted. However, opponents, many of whom held strong religious views, were successful with repeal in Australia. Similar opposition in Oregon was formidable, but ultimately lost in a 60-40% vote reaffirming physician-assisted dying. This paper examines the human dilemma which arises when technological advances in end-of-life medicine conflict with traditional and religious sanctity-of-life values. Society places high value on personal autonomy, particularly in the United States. We compare the potential for inherent contradictions and arbitrary decisions where patient autonomy is either permitted or forbidden. The broader implications for human experience resulting from new legislation in both Australia and Oregon are discussed. We conclude that allowing autonomy for the terminally ill, within circumscribed options, results in fewer ethical contradictions and greater preservation of dignity.

Key Words: Physician-assisted suicide • voluntary euthanasia • patient autonomy • religious belief


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Chapple, A, Ziebland, S, McPherson, A, Herxheimer, A (2006). What people close to death say about euthanasia and assisted suicide: a qualitative study. J. Med. Ethics 32: 706-710 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • O'Neill, C, Feenan, D, Hughes, C, McAlister, D A (2002). Attitudes to physician and family assisted suicide: results from a study of public attitudes in Britain. J. Med. Ethics 28: 52-52 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Baffled
Dileep M Bagnall
JME Online, 28 Jan 2003 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.