Should we clone human beings? Cloning as a source of tissue for transplantation.
Murdoch Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
The most publicly justifiable application of human cloning, if there is one at all, is to provide self-compatible cells or tissues for medical use, especially transplantation. Some have argued that this raises no new ethical issues above those raised by any form of embryo experimentation. I argue that this research is less morally problematic than other embryo research. Indeed, it is not merely morally permissible but morally required that we employ cloning to produce embryos or fetuses for the sake of providing cells, tissues or even organs for therapy, followed by abortion of the embryo or fetus.
Relevant Article
- Human reproductive cloning is unethical because it undermines autonomy: commentary on Savulescu.
- R Williamson
J. Med. Ethics 1999 25: 96-97.[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Devolder, K
(2005). Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells. J. Med. Ethics
31: 366-370
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Gogarty, B
(2003). What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia. J. Med. Ethics
29: 84-89
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
